|
The Year of the Flood: A Novel |  | Author: Margaret Atwood Publisher: Nan A. Talese Category: Book
List Price: $26.95 Buy New: $15.00 as of 11/22/2009 21:57 MST details You Save: $11.95 (44%)
New (38) Used (13) Collectible (9) from $12.99
Seller: royaloakbooks Rating: 62 reviews Sales Rank: 248
Format: Deckle Edge Media: Hardcover Edition: First Printing Pages: 448 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7 Dimensions (in): 9.8 x 6.6 x 1.6
ISBN: 0385528779 Dewey Decimal Number: 813.54 EAN: 9780385528771 ASIN: 0385528779
Publication Date: September 22, 2009 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description The long-awaited new novel from Margaret Atwood. The Year of the Flood is a dystopic masterpiece and a testament to her visionary power.
The times and species have been changing at a rapid rate, and the social compact is wearing as thin as environmental stability. Adam One, the kindly leader of the God's Gardeners—a religion devoted to the melding of science and religion, as well as the preservation of all plant and animal life—has long predicted a natural disaster that will alter Earth as we know it. Now it has occurred, obliterating most human life. Two women have survived: Ren, a young trapeze dancer locked inside the high-end sex club Scales and Tails, and Toby, a God's Gardener barricaded inside a luxurious spa where many of the treatments are edible.
Have others survived? Ren's bioartist friend Amanda? Zeb, her eco-fighter stepfather? Her onetime lover, Jimmy? Or the murderous Painballers, survivors of the mutual-elimination Painball prison? Not to mention the shadowy, corrupt policing force of the ruling powers . . .
Meanwhile, gene-spliced life forms are proliferating: the lion/lamb blends, the Mo'hair sheep with human hair, the pigs with human brain tissue. As Adam One and his intrepid hemp-clad band make their way through this strange new world, Ren and Toby will have to decide on their next move. They can't stay locked away . . .
By turns dark, tender, violent, thoughtful, and uneasily hilarious, The Year of the Flood is Atwood at her most brilliant and inventive.
Amazon.com Review Book Description The long-awaited new novel from Margaret Atwood. The Year of the Flood is a dystopic masterpiece and a testament to her visionary power. The times and species have been changing at a rapid rate, and the social compact is wearing as thin as environmental stability. Adam One, the kindly leader of the God's Gardeners--a religion devoted to the melding of science and religion, as well as the preservation of all plant and animal life--has long predicted a natural disaster that will alter Earth as we know it. Now it has occurred, obliterating most human life. Two women have survived: Ren, a young trapeze dancer locked inside the high-end sex club Scales and Tails, and Toby, a God's Gardener barricaded inside a luxurious spa where many of the treatments are edible. Have others survived? Ren's bioartist friend Amanda? Zeb, her eco-fighter stepfather? Her onetime lover, Jimmy? Or the murderous Painballers, survivors of the mutual-elimination Painball prison? Not to mention the shadowy, corrupt policing force of the ruling powers... Meanwhile, gene-spliced life forms are proliferating: the lion/lamb blends, the Mo'hair sheep with human hair, the pigs with human brain tissue. As Adam One and his intrepid hemp-clad band make their way through this strange new world, Ren and Toby will have to decide on their next move. They can't stay locked away... By turns dark, tender, violent, thoughtful, and uneasily hilarious, The Year of the Flood is Atwood at her most brilliant and inventive. Margaret Atwood on The Year of the Flood
I’ve never before gone back to a novel and written another novel related to it. Why this time? Partly because so many people asked me what happened right after the end of the 2003 novel, Oryx and Crake. I didn’t actually know, but the questions made me think about it. That was one reason. Another was that the core subject matter has continued to preoccupy me. When Oryx and Crake came out, it seemed to many like science fiction--way out there, too weird to be possible--but in the three years that passed before I began writing The Year of the Flood, the perceived gap between that supposedly unreal future and the harsh one we might very well live through was narrowing fast. What is happening to our world? What can we do to reverse the damage? How long have we got? And, most importantly--what kind of "we"? In other words, what kind of people might undertake the challenge? Dedicated ones--they’d have to be. And unless you believe our planet is worth saving, why bother? So the question of inspirational belief entered the picture, and once you have a set of beliefs--as distinct from a body of measurable knowledge--you have a religion. The God’s Gardeners appear briefly in Oryx and Crake, but in The Year of the Flood, they’re central. Like all religions, the Gardeners have their own leader, Adam One. They also have their own honoured saints and martyrs, their special days, their theology. They may look strange and obsessive and even foolish to non-members, but they’re serious about what they profess; as are their predecessors, who are with us today. I’ve found out a great deal about rooftop gardens and urban beekeeping while writing this book! Another question frequently asked about Oryx and Crake concerned gender. Why was the story told by a man? How would it have been different if the narrator had been a woman? Such questions led me to Ren and Toby, and then to their respective lives, and also to their places of refuge. A high-end sex club and a luxury spa would in fact be quite good locations in which to wait out a pandemic plague: at least you’d have bar snacks, and a lot of clean towels. In his book, The Art Instinct, Denis Dutton proposes that our interest in narrative is built in--selected during the very long period the human race spent in the Pleistocene--because any species with the ability to tell stories about both past and future would have an evolutionary edge. Will there be a crocodile in the river tomorrow, as there was last year? If so, better not go there. Speculative fictions about the future, like The Year of the Flood, are narratives of that kind. Where will the crocodiles be? How will we avoid them? What are our chances? --Margaret Atwood (Photo © George Whiteside)
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 62
highly recommended November 22, 2009 B. Capossere (Rochester, NY USA) Margaret Atwood's Year of the Flood is set in the same world as her earlier novel Oryx and Crake. Like Oryx and her much 1980's dystopia The Handmaid's Tale, Atwood extrapolates from modern scientific and cultural/social trends to depict a horrifying future. Here we have corporate control (HelthWyzer Corporation), genetic manipulation (one example: the libam -- half lion, half lamb), heavily secure compounds for the well-to-do (the future's "gated" communities), jobs schlepping "burgers" for the less-well-to-do at Secretburgers (with a nod to Soylent Green) or doing "plank work" at SeksMart (say it out loud) or Scales and Tails. The even worse-well-to-do end up disappeared (check those burgers) and criminals are thrown into the Paintball Prison--a combination of incarceration and reality TV. Various religious sects preach their dogma, including a group of vegetarian pacifists known as The Gardeners, who predict the coming "Waterless Flood," which comes in the form of an amazing quick and virulent plague, wiping out much of humanity.
The book opens post-plague with two survivors, both former Gardeners: Ren, who was locked into a secure room at Scales and Tails and so avoided contamination; and Toby, at the AnooYou spa. The book then alternates between real time and flashbacks showing us how the two ended up where they are, using first person for one character and third for the other. Between such chapters we also get sermons from the leader of the Gardeners (Adam One) and Gardener hymns. Along the way, we meet a host of other characters, including the two that would eventually become Oryx and Crake of the earlier book (the events of the two books eventually dovetail to some extent).
This is typical Atwood, which means it all (or near enough all) pretty much just works, seemingly effortlessly. You begin to inhabit this world very early on, nodding your head as you're introduced to yet another reasonable trend forward from our time--it's all fully realized and concrete. The same holds true for the characters as Atwood shifts from one to the other without missing a beat, capturing the inner voice of a young girl or the more confident voice of a group leader with equal sure-footedness, and showing the changes in characters over time in her usual subtle fashion.
The plot is compelling from the start thanks to the use of the split chronology; simply telling it in linear fashion would have necessitated too much intro as the society was explained. This way we get both the world building and the tension of how/if Ren and Toby, two very different personas--one tough, the other gentle-- will survive. Atwood also throws in other tension pre-plague: a viciously violent former boss out for Toby's blood, concern over the Gardener's more illicit activities, and so on. The tension throughout is leavened by humor--sometimes overt, sometimes wry--and the warm relationships among several characters, especially the women.
A gripping story that becomes more so as the book moves on, compelling characters, serious thematic content, a wonderfully inventive not-so-far-flung future--it's all here in The Year of The Flood, one of the my favorite books by one of my favorite authors. Highly recommended.
The Year of the Flood: A Novel November 21, 2009 K. B. Tipton (Albany, NY) I love Margaret Atwood, have been her follower for years. This book sets the scene for an earlier book, "Oryx and Crake." It is a scary and thrilling book, written in several first persons view points.
I liked Oryx and Crake better November 21, 2009 Someone's Mom (Chesapeake, VA) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Once I figured out that Atwood was essentially retelling the same story as that of oryx and Crake from a different viewpoint, I lost my desire to finish the book. THere was simply very little suspense left for me when I figured out that I already knew what had happened and how the book would end. I actually LOVED the world which Atwood created in Oryx and Crake, a sort of modern dysutopia where the corporations own everything and provide for everyone who falls within their unit but where those who don't belong to a corporation live in a sort of no man's land within America. Essentially it's a series of gated communities, where the divisions between the haves and have nots are even sharper than they are today. This time, the story is told not from inside the corporation, as it was in Oryx and Crake, but rather from one of the fringe doomsday cults which arose as America went down. The God's Gardeners cult and its members, their rituals and beliefs form the basis of the story -- with excerpts from their religious writings and hymns sprinkled in with the story. Atwood's writing is so convincing that you can almost spell the unwashed children in the cult, and taste the vegan food and picture the hand-dyed robes which leave the children spattered with blue dye. But the signs and wonders which accompany the last days of America are much less miraculous and wondrous if you already know the story is going to end -- and there's really no NEW social commentary (which is what Atwood does best), since we've already heard the story before. For me, the best part of the story was reencountering some of my favorite characters from Oryx and Crake from a new viewpoint -- but I think it might have simply been better had she written a more conventional sequel to the first book, picking up the story where it left off, rather than revisiting old ground.
great book bad read November 19, 2009 Kelle Brucker 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
i loved the idea of the book and characters. however i can not stand the way she jumps from time to time. the characters go back and forth thru their lives and its grating. also dont care for the way she ends the book which she seems to do with all her books i have read so far. love the ideas but she doesnt seem to give anything close to a conclusion maybe this is so we will buy more of her books? overall it could happen. will read more of her books.
Like a train wreck, you can't look away! November 18, 2009 S. M. Reilly 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I buy into the strong feasibility that is an undercurrent of most of Margaret Atwood's novels. They are parables, cautionary tales that are just real enough to take seriously. This one started slower than most, but by the end I was racing to find out what happened. The fact that is it part of the puzzle that was Oryx and Crake only adds to its appeal. You have to read both. The ending is alluringly oblique, just more evidence that Atwood is a writer who entertains you and makes you think.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 62
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. Working Dogs | |